Skip to content
September 11, 2011 / unitedagainstzionism

10 Years Later: Who Didn’t Do 9/11

After 10 years, the mainstream media continues to pretend there are no valid questions surrounding 9/11.

We are still supposed to ignore all evidence and common sense and believe that 19 deeply religious Muslim fundamentalists committed an incredibly daring martyrdom operation of coordinated plane hijackings and mass suicide, for no conceivable benefit to their cause. We are supposed to not ask the fundamental question that any competent investigator must ask — that of “Cui bono” — who benefits from this crime. Or for that matter, who — with the benefit of retrospective — definitely did NOT benefit.

We are supposed to believe that these al-Qaeda terrorists accidentally brought more death and destruction than ever before to their Muslim brethren whom they were supposedly acting on behalf of, by bringing the wrath of the infinitely superior force of the US military upon their nations.

We are supposed to believe that these terrorists deemed it worth to trade a few thousand “enemy” lives for millions of Muslims in their lands — the predictable American “retaliation” having been inescapable to these terrorists who already saw America as “the great Satan,” a demonic entity that has killed Muslims everywhere.

Or, alternatively, we are supposed to believe that they had the intelligence and skills to pull off such a daring operation, yet didn’t anticipate the vastly disproportionate response the bloodthirsty, criminal, terrorist regime that they hated so much would unleash upon their favorite country (Taliban-ruled Afghanistan).

We are told “Al Qaeda” and Osama bin Laden himself admitted responsibility, but it isn’t true. Osama issued several denials of responsibility, suggesting that Zionists may have been behind it, and he never made any confession in videos, as commonly claimed.

We are supposed to believe the hijackers evaded authorities for years but then suddenly began to leave a long paper trail, using credit cards on their own names. They also engaged in un-Islamic behavior (alcohol, pork, cocaine, strippers, cursing God — every possible un-Islamic behavior!) that devout Muslims about to carry out a martyrdom operation would not do. The lead hijacker, Mohammed Atta, barely reached the airport in time for the flight, then packed no less than two bags on his final suicide trip, but the bags failed to make it on board, allowing the FBI to find operational details including the identities of all of the hijackers — allowing them to announce “case solved” on the same day of the attacks.

We are supposed to believe that, once on the planes, the hijackers waited for far too long to hijack them, allowing — under normal circumstances — the NORAD and Air Force defense systems plenty of time to intercept the planes. They turned off the transponders, disabling communications with Air Traffic Controllers on the ground, then somehow managed to find their targets unassisted, a feat that professional pilots wouldn’t dare. And the absurdities go on.

Beyond the alleged hijackers, we are supposed to believe in all manner of ridiculous explanations, such as that the complete bungling of the air defenses can be explained by incompetence alone — that it’s nothing but a series of innocent coincidences — as were the hijacking exercises and war games, and really everything else that contradicts the official conspiracy theory of the 19 magical Muslims.

We are supposed to take on faith the probabilistically preposterous idea that two buildings could collapse straight down in the exact same way after only being hit by relatively small aircraft and having office fires burn for a short while. We are supposed to dismiss as irrelevant the fact that the WTC complex was privatized just before 9/11 and that the owner/leaseholder of the WTC buildings took control over security proceedings, and just so happens to be a personal friend of several Israeli Prime Ministers.


We are supposed to dismiss the fact that Israeli Mossad agents were found all around New York City and New Jersey that day and after, that the only ones arrested on that day by local police and FBI were some of these Israeli agents working for a Mossad front company (Urban Moving Systems), and that the media didn’t report these facts more than once. A local media or on-scene correspondent for major media reports the incidents once, then they vanish from the airwaves and print, never to be heard of again — and we’re supposed to dismiss this as insignificant! Were it not for the Internet (and video sites like Youtube that made uploading videos easy) we wouldn’t have been able to confirm that Israeli agents tried to blow up the George Washington bridge on 9/11, something that would have multiplied the chaos and destruction.

Locations where Israeli agents were spotted on 9/11

The GW Bridge bombers were apparently the same “5 Dancing Israelis” who were a few hours earlier seen celebrating and mocking the attacks as they happened, first in Liberty State Park and later in Weehawken (near the Lincoln Tunnel). These locations are close to the WTC but in the New Jersey side of the Hudson River, which separates NJ and the Manhattan borough of NYC. When pulled over by police, the driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg, told the officers: “We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem.”

Prior to their arrest, an unidentified person called 9-1-1 and told Jersey City police about a Palestinian/Arab bomb-maker driving toward the Holland Tunnel: “a white van, 2 or 3 guys in there, they look like Palestinians […] a minivan heading toward the Holland tunnel, I see the guy by Newark Airport mixing some junk and he has those sheikh uniform […] He’s dressed like an Arab.” The mystery caller prompted the police to close off not only the Holland Tunnel, but also the other bridges and tunnels connecting New Jersey to Manhattan (specifically the Lincoln Tunnel and the GW Bridge).

At 3:31 p.m, the FBI issued a “be on the lookout” alert for a white van based on the New Jersey residents who reported the cheerful Israelis to 9-1-1. The alert read in part: “White, 2000 Chevrolet van with New Jersey registration with ‘Urban Moving Systems’ sign on back seen at Liberty State Park, Jersey City, NJ, at the time of first impact of jetliner into World Trade Center.”

Artist impression of the Dancing Israelis

According to local media, the 5 Israeli men were detained around 4:30 p.m driving eastward along Route 3 in East Rutherford in an “Urban Moving Systems” van, very close to the Lincoln Tunnel on the New Jersey side. They were reportedly “carrying maps linking them to the blasts,” and when inspecting their van, “bomb-sniffing dogs reacted as if they had detected explosives.” They also had box cutters, $4700 in cash stuffed in a sock, and their foreign passports.

Perplexingly, Israeli media reported the van being detained to the GW Bridge, which is about 10 miles away from the Lincoln Tunnel. The precision of these reports suggest that there may have been two different vans stopped: one on a ramp leading to the GW Bridge with 2 Israelis arrested, and the other near the Lincoln Tunnel with 3 Israelis arrested; or, alternatively, with 5 Israelis arrested in each van.

A transcript of 9/11 police radio transmissions mentions a van around the Holland Tunnel at about 1:19 p.m.: “(Inaudible) from the Holland Tunnel exit, a tan Ford alpha van […] Information has it this van was seen with possible terrorists in it, with explosives.” This may have been in reference to the mystery caller that alerted about specifically Palestinian/Arab suspects heading toward the Holland Tunnel, though the caller did not describe the van as a “tan Ford alpha.”

Artist rendition of the 9/11 Mural Van

An even stranger police radio transmission has an officer speaking of “a big truck with a mural painted of [an] airplane diving into New York City,” this white van actually exploding in King Street between 6th and 7th in NYC, close to the Holland Tunnel. Two unidentified “Middle Eastern men” were arrested when trying to flee the scene.

The reports of truck bombs on 9/11 were so widespread that some thought truck bombs were used inside the WTC towers. 9/11 hero William Rodriguez and other eyewitnesses from inside the towers say explosions occurred in the basements moments before the first plane hit — could these explosions have been truck bombs?

Two days after 9/11, three more Israelis were arrested by police in Plymouth, Pennsylvania with “detailed video footage” of the Sears Tower (the tallest building in the U.S. and arguably the 3rd most significant landmark building after the twin towers). They also possessed “maps of the city [of Chicago] with certain places highlighted.” The police were alerted by locals reporting illegal dumping of furniture by a tractor-trailer, labeled “Moving Systems Incorporated.” The driver, Moshe Elmakias, told police he had come from New York for a furniture pickup job, but when further questioned was unable to “provide a name or telephone number of the customer.” Another of the suspects, Ayelet Reisler, “had a German passport in her name and medication in a different name,” according to police.

When the FBI raided the offices of Urban Moving Systems on September 14th, they found the owner, Dominick Suter, had fled to Israel in a hurry, “leaving behind coffee cups, sandwiches, cell phones and computers strewn on office tables and thousands of dollars of goods in storage.”

In late September 2001, another 6 Israelis possessing “photos and descriptions of a nuclear power plant in Florida and the Trans-Alaska pipeline” were detained somewhere in the Midwest and quickly released by police without calling the FBI — so quickly that the FBI searched for them afterwards. They also carried “box cutters and other equipment,” and were “traveling in groups of three in two white sedans.”

Zionist terrorists cover themselves after trying to blow up the Mexican Congress building

On October 11, exactly 1 month after 9/11, 2 Zionist terrorists were arrested with pistols, grenades, high explosives, and detonators, inside the Mexican Congress building (Palacio Legislativo de San Lázaro). The terrorists were identified as Salvador Guersson Smecke, a colonel with the Israeli special forces, and Sar ben Zui, an Israeli illegal immigrant. CNN reported the story once, promising to bring more details, but the story was never heard of again on American TV. The story apparently disappeared even from the Mexican media after a few days.

Crucially, El Diario de Mexico revealed that the two Zionist terrorists had fake Pakistani passports on them, confirming that it was a false flag operation in which Muslims would be blamed for the terrorist attack. The terrorists were soon released and shipped to Israel after pressure by Israel and an emergency meeting between Mexican Secretary of Foreign Affairs Jorge Castañeda Gutman (reportedly Jewish), the head of the Mexican Justice department General Rafael Marcial Macedo de la Concha, Elías Luf of the Israeli Embassy, and a top Ariel Sharon envoy.

The Mexican Congress incident is extremely significant, for it is a clear-cut case of Israeli agents trying to frame Muslims for terrorist attacks that they themselves were going to commit.

Some 6 weeks after the “5 Dancing Israelis” (and GW Bridge would-be bombers) were detained, it was reported that Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage, criminal lawyer Alan Dershowitz, and two unidentified “prominent New York congressmen” were lobbying heavily for their release. Despite repeatedly failing polygraph tests, at the end of November 2001, they were flown home to Israel for no other reason than “visa violations.” They later said on Israeli TV that their “purpose was to document the event,” apparently without elaborating.

On May 7th, 2002, yet another suspicious moving van was stopped by police, this one in Oak Harbor, Washington near the Whidbey Island Naval Air Station. Carl Cameron of Fox News reported that the van was pulled over for speeding shortly after midnight. The passengers told the police they were delivering furniture, but because it was so late at night, the police weren’t buying the story. A bomb sniffing dog was brought in and the dog detected the presence of TNT and RDX plastic explosives in the truck. The driver and passenger, both Israeli nationals, were (as with all the others) held on “immigration violations” rather than as terrorism suspects and soon shipped to Israel at the expense of American taxpayers.

Then there is the so-called Israeli spy ring. Throughout late 2000 and 2001, a total of around 200 Israeli spies were arrested in the U.S., in “the largest spy ring to ever be uncovered in the history of the United States.” Some 120 of them were posing as “art students” and were arrested for trying to sneak into secured US Federal buildings, including the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), which had been investigating drug trafficking by Israeli organized crime. The DEA released an extremely detailed report exposing 125 Israeli spies. The report states:

“Most admit to having served in the Israeli Military. This is not surprising given the mandatory military service require in Israel, however, a majority of those questioned has stated they served in military intelligence, electronic signal intercept, or explosive ordinance units. Some have been linked to high-ranking officials in the Israeli military. One was the son of a two-star general, one served as the bodyguard to the head of the Israeli Army, one served in a Patriot missile unit. That these people are now traveling in the U.S. selling art seems not to fit their background.”

A majority of them served in “military intelligence, electronic signal intercept, or explosive ordinance units” — exactly the kind of background needed for parts of the 9/11 operation — an incredible “coincidence” that defies belief.

Carl Cameron of FOX News Channel did by far the best reporting on this story, in his 4-part series. Cameron was told that “evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified,” and it remains so 10 years later. Under pressure, Fox News removed the written transcripts of the series from its website, but the damning report lives on for all to see on Youtube. Carl Cameron also provided this gem:

“Investigators within the DEA, INS, and FBI have all told FOX News that to pursue or even suggest Israeli spying is considered career suicide.”

That’s “Israeli spying” — not to speak of Israeli involvement in terror attacks against the U.S. that are blamed on Muslims!

None of these 9/11 bombers and post-9/11 terrorists were CIA agents or US military personnel (and they certainly weren’t Muslims). They were agents of the one foreign government that benefited the most from the attacks. They were agents of the one foreign government that has the largest history of carrying out similar covert operations based on deception. They were agents of the one foreign government that somehow got away with attacking an American ship in international waters in 1967 and somehow getting the American government AND media to cover it up ever since!

These reports should make any thinking person consider the possibility that 9/11 may have been an Israeli false flag operation.

The influential Jewish supremacist organization the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, essentially an arm of the Israeli government, explains the concept in surprisingly accurate detail:

“In the ten years since the September 11 terrorist attacks on America, conspiracy theories surrounding the attacks have become an entrenched propaganda industry. These assaults on memory and history attempt to place blame for the attacks on sources other than Al Qaeda, such as the U.S. government. Prominent among such 9/11 conspiracy theories are those that make the anti-Semitic claim that Jews—whether Israeli, American, or both– were involved in planning and executing the attacks. This anti-Semitic faction is only a part of the so-called “9/11 truth movement,” yet it is vocal and pervasive, particularly on the Internet.”

The ADL has upgraded us to “only a part” of the 9/11 truth movement, up form “a tiny minority” 5 years ago. The truth of obvious Israeli involvement in 9/11 has reached almost every 9/11 truther. Only those who have not broken through the “anti-Semite” dichotomy are still trying to put the blame on Cheney and “elements” of the US government or vague, unspecific entitities (NWO, global elite, TPTB, etc). The ADL continues:

“The most prominent promoters of these anti-Semitic conspiracy theories today tend less often to be white supremacists and right-wing anti-Semites. Rather they are more commonly members of a group of anti-Israel conspiracists who see the 9/11 attacks as one of a series of “false flag” operations that Israel has carried out to manufacture a war against its Muslim enemies (the term “false flag” operations refers to acts of sabotage or terror conducted by one perpetrator but designed to appear as if conducted by another, with the goal of setting the victim at odds with the false perpetrator).”

This is an excellent explanation by the ADL — I could not have put it better! The ADL could have added that it is also the form of terrorism that makes the most sense, and that Israel has admitted carrying out the King David Hotel bombing, the Lavon affair, and a few other smaller false flag operations.

Could 9/11 have been an Israeli intelligence operation using a couple of angry and misled Muslim men to serve as the scapegoats? The best way to create a “legend,” or false identity trail, is to use real people who believe in the cause. Sow confusion by falsifying parts of their identities such as birth dates for those with common Arabic names, using stolen passports, etc, and you have not only a solid legend for American investigators to follow, but also a perfect diversion for the skeptics to focus on (“hijackers are still alive”). Since the trails lead to real people with friends and family, investigators would see no need to question initial assumptions which their investigations are based upon (such as “al-Qaeda” being responsible).

All evidence seems to indicate this is the case, while evidence of direct CIA or US military involvement has failed to come up after 10 years. There is only evidence of Arabs (official) and Israelis (unofficial) being directly involved.

Yes, this CIA official knew this and that FBI official knew that. Covering up their knowledge of the whereabouts of some of the alleged hijackers does not constitute evidence of direct involvement, only of following orders to “not interfere.” Nor do mere “connections” equal in importance reports by reporters on the scene reporting that truck bombs were stopped by astute police officers from blowing up bridges and tunnels on 9/11.

Which brings us to the next subject.


“It’s been 10 years and we still don’t know who did 9/11.” This is a slogan that some 9/11 truthers insist on using. These 9/11 truthers would have us believe that, since we don’t know every detail of how it happened, we don’t really know who did it either.

If we accept the following major facts about the 9/11 events, as all reasonable 9/11 truthers do…

• the WTC twin towers could not possibly have been destroyed due to the plane impacts plus the resulting kerosene-fueled fires

• the official explanation(s) offered for WTC 7’s collapse is even more preposterous

• aluminothermic nano-composite material was found in several dust samples collected from the WTC site

• it is too improbable that the trillion-dollar air defense system would fail so miserably, and it is unreasonable that hijackers could have expected to succeed

• if controlled demolition is accepted as fact, it is operationally unfeasible to let the airplane hijackings entirely up to some incompetent Arabs

• and many other improbable and unreasonable chains of events

…then it is obvious that the most important objective of the 9/11 truth movement should be to find out made the air defenses fail and who rigged the buildings for demolition. The dramatic fate of the twin towers served as the main psychological weapon of that day, and the demolitions were also what killed the most people (more than 80% of the victims).

Why would any 9/11 truther spend more time researching who did what and who knew that in the CIA or FBI or even White House, than who had the motive, means, and opportunity to plant the thousands of explosive devices necessary to demolish the buildings, and to create the conditions necessary to ensure the air defenses would fail to intercept the hijacked airplanes?

A Coward Truther, that’s who. All roads lead to Israel, but the Coward Truthers, terrified of being labeled “anti-Semitic,” dismiss and try to avoid coming across this evidence, preferring instead to blame vague, unclear, unspecific entities — such as the “US government” or the “New World Order” — or hint at Saudi and Pakistani involvement. They would rather blame their own government in vague terms than blame a specific, tangible, identified group of people with a well-defined and long laid out ideological motivation which involves a foreign government.

Yes, of course Cheney was “in on it” — it was precisely his gang of “shadow NSC” at the White House, staffed by Israel-firsters from PNAC and other Zionist think tanks (bypassing the more “American” Bush-Rice-Clarke-Powell official NSC and essentially controlling foreign policy), along with Israel-first neocons at the Pentagon who reduced the Pentagon’s role in counter-terrorism, who made sure Mossad’s “al Qaeda” false flag operation would succeed.

To the Coward Truthers (and new truthers): make this the 9/11 year in which you ditch your irrational fear of being labeled anti-Semitic. It is the same smear as that other label that you are used to live with — it is its precursor, its older brother.

Do your homework regarding the clear Israeli involvement, and join the real truth movement. Let’s make it what it should be: the anti-Zionist, anti-war, anti-globalization, anti-usury, 9/11 truth movement.

May 31, 2011 / unitedagainstzionism

Gaza Flotilla Massacre: Analysis of Israel’s many propaganda arms

A detailed analysis of the Israeli terrorist attack against the Gaza Freedom Flotilla 1 year ago on 31 May 2010 in international waters, with a focus on the lies that Israel’s massive propaganda machine spewed after the massacre.


Israel maintains a land, air, and sea blockade of the Gaza Strip, supposedly to prevent the smuggling of arms into the hands of militant organizations based there. However, Israel also blocks food, construction material, fuel, toiletries, and a long etc, claiming that these items have a “dual-use”, i.e. that they can be used to make weapons.

Israel’s isolation of Gaza can be traced back to at least 1967, but it was after Hamas won a majority in transparent democratic elections in 2006 that Israel created a ruthless blockade of the Gaza Strip. When Hamas took power after clashes with Fatah in June 2007, Israel’s blockade was tightened further. A ceasefire agreement between Hamas and Israel in mid-2008, in which Hamas would prevent rocket attacks and Israel would lift the blockade, was dishonored by Israel while it prepared for its murderous Operation Cast Lead.

White Phosphorus vs. Gaza school children

On 27 December 2008, the Israeli military launched Operation Cast Lead, which not only killed some 1400 defenseless Palestinians, but also destroyed vital infrastructure leaving the Gazans with critical water and sewage problems. Repair of the infrastructure has proved impossible as Israel has prevented the entry of construction materials and fuel.

With 1.5 million inhabitants and as one of the world’s most densely populated areas, Gaza is currently dealing with serious health issues due to the 80 million litres of sewage being released into the environment and Mediterranean Sea each day. The World Health Organization has warned of a possible cholera epidemic if nothing is done rapidly to resolve this sanitation crisis.

The sewage leakage has affected almost all clean water sources. According to Physicians for Human Rights-Israel: “Between 90% and 95% of the aquifers in the Gaza Strip are not safe for drinking.” The primary cause of the current problem originates from the destruction, during Operation Cast Lead, of “20 kilometers of water pipes, 7.5 kilometers of sewage pipes and 5,700 mobile water tanks”.

The Egyptian dictatorship of Hosni Mubarak was an accomplice in this malevolent, inhumane blockade, by closing the border between Gaza and Egypt, known as the Rafah crossing. This forced Palestinians to risk their lives digging long tunnels underneath the border to get into Egypt and bring supplies back into Gaza. The Mubarak government started constructing a steel wall deep into the ground to destroy Gaza’s tunnel economy. But the new military junta of Egypt, under heavy pressure by the Egyptian people who have so far seen little change after Mubarak’s ouster, announced on 25 May 2011 that Egypt will permanently open the Rafah crossing. But Palestinians are not holding their breath. It might not last for long.

Israel, of course, claims there is no ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza. A humanitarian crisis documented by every human rights group to ever enter Gaza in the last few years since the blockade began.


The Free Gaza Movement is a human rights group that has sailed several times to Gaza to try to break Israel’s criminal stranglehold on 1.5 million Palestinian civilians. They entered Gaza successfully five times in 2008, but ever since Israel’s slaughter of 1,400 Palestinians in Operation Cast Lead, the FGM were violently intercepted on its 3 voyages prior to the 31 May 2010 lethal attack on the Mavi Marmara.

The late May 2010 flotilla was the largest attempt to date, with 6 civilian boats carrying 700 human rights activists from over 40 nationalities along with some 30-40 journalists from around the world sent to report on the flotilla’s mission. The six-ship flotilla was carrying 10,000 tons of humanitarian aid for the artificially impoverished people of Gaza. The flotilla was a joint effort by the FGM and the IHH (Insani Yardim Vakfi, or Foundation for Human Rights and Freedoms and Humanitarian Relief, an Islamic aid group based in Turkey), which sponsored a large passenger ship and two cargo ships.

The Mavi Marmara was the large passenger ship carrying hundreds of activists that was sponsored by the IHH. Israel has claimed for years that the IHH has ties to Hamas, implying that it “supports terrorism.” This is of course another lie, as Israel and the Israel-firsters in politics and the media always label any Arab or Muslim they attack as “terrorist” or “terrorist sympathizing”, and anyone else as the tired old canard of “anti-Semite”.

In response to the flotilla mission, the Israeli government threatened to send out “half” of its Naval forces to stop the flotilla, using force if necessary. Israel had already launched a disinformation campaign against the Gaza Freedom Flotilla long before the 31 May 2010 attack.

Among the activists on the Mavi Marmara was Joe Meadors, survivor of the Israeli terrorist attack on the USS Liberty on 8 June 1967, also in international waters, which killed 34 Americans in a false flag operation intended to get a war started between the US and Egypt. The parallels between the two attacks are many, but the most notable is that the US government and media refuse to condemn the killing of American citizens. For a personal eyewitness account of the attack on the USS Liberty, read What I Saw That Day, by USS Liberty survivor Phil Tourney.


Flotilla routes

Eastern Mediterranean Sea, Monday, May 31st, 2010, about 4.30am: about 15 speedboats with some 20 Shayetet 13 IDF commandos on each, began shooting paintball ammunition, followed by tear gas canisters into the Mavi Marmara ship and proceeded to board the deck from three Black Hawk helicopters hovering above the ship. Aside from dropping soldiers down to the deck, they shot at passengers from the choppers (possibly as a response to slingshot hits, but possibly planned) killing at least two. The helicopters probably also served to provide intelligence to the commandos on the boats and on deck. The Israelis had also jammed the satellite communications, making all phones inoperable (there is no terrestrial coverage in international waters).

The official story remains that Israeli commandos responded initially with non-lethal weaponry before resorting to live fire, when in fact they started sniping out passengers from the choppers before most of the commandos had boarded the deck. The Israelis claimed that live fire was directed at them, but the most the activists had was a few slingshots (and guns taken from the commandos which they didn’t use).

Turkish autopsies would reveal on 4 June 2010 that the 9 victims on board the Mavi Marmara were shot a total of 30 times, and 5 were killed by gunshot wounds to the head. This meant that about half of the victims were executed with shots to the head, disproving Israel’s story that the commandos were only defending themselves. A United Nations fact-finding mission later confirmed in September 2010 that 6 of the 9 victims had been “summarily executed,” two after they had already been severely injured and were incapable of defending themselves. This should have shattered Israel’s cover story, but the media narrative remained unchanged (more on this later).

The Israelis handcuffed everyone on board and brought them out to the external decks, where the usual Israeli mistreatment of prisoners occurred. Most were forced to kneel for hours. Random kickings, verbal abuse and threats were commonplace throughout the ordeal. For example, one Malaysian man was pleading that his handcuffs were too tight and were causing him great pain, so an Israeli soldier tightened them further. For long periods, prisoners were deprived of food and refused to go to the toilet.

Ken O'Keefe beaten by IDF thugs AFTER the raid

Early during the raid, 3 commandos were overpowered and thrown from the roof onto a lower deck, causing heavy injuries. The Israelis got this on video and made good use of it as propaganda to “prove” the malevolent intention of the peace activists. Once rendered harmless without their guns, the captured commandos begged for mercy, thinking that the activists would apply the principle of “an eye for an eye.” Some of the angry activists beat up the commandos, understandably so after seeing the other commandos executing several of their shipmates, but did not kill them. They could easily have shot them, but instead they threw the weapons off the ship, and the activist medics on board subsequently treated the commandos for their wounds. In contrast, the IDF soldiers denied medical treatment to wounded activists who died shortly thereafter (presumably the 3 that were not summarily executed).

Former US Marine Ken O’Keefe was one of the activists who disarmed and then safeguarded the captured commandos. To show their appreciation, O’Keefe was later badly beaten while under IDF custody. In an article condemning the BBC’s criminal Zionist propaganda, O’Keefe explains with these powerful words:

IDF commando treated by Turkish doctor during raid

And yes the poor Israeli commandos were beaten, just as any invader in any capable persons home would be beaten. I take no issue with that fact.

But truth be told, the commandos we captured should thank us for their lives. I ask the Israeli’s, British and American people specifically, if your home was invaded, your family being murdered, would you be willing to disarm, completely control, and then set a murderer of your family free???

You can lie to yourself if you like, bury that head right down deep in the sand, but that ship was our home, and we were all brothers and sisters, aunties and uncles, united, a family, engaged in a most righteous cause, with the vast majority of the planet behind us. The primary beneficiary of our mission, over 800,000 innocent children.

For those lost in a pit of ignorance and indoctrination, those currently stripped of all reason, absent of conscience, duped and hoodwinked, I know you very well because I was once you, a US Marine robot volunteering to kill or be killed. I see my past self in the Zionist who has no capacity at this moment to think, for in that state it is all about regurgitation, independent thought is but a possibility. For you I maintain no hate, for nobody actually, rather it is pity, pity for you that you sacrifice the greatest gift of all, the gift of humanity.

And so it is that the BBC, absent of integrity, contemptuous of humanity, attempts in this [Panorama ‘Death on the Med’] program to turn disarmed, helpless Israeli commandos into heroic self-rescuing commandos who managed to Superman their way out of a circle of well over 100 very motivated men whose brothers lay murdered with multiple gunshot wounds. That is what we call a bald-faced lie. Big time lie, in your face lie, you in the audience are a bunch of drooling idiots lie.

Returning from the Zionist alternate universe, we held in our power the fate of three boy commandos who may well have been murderers on that night. Think about that, under these circumstances, we let them go. That is what we call preserving life.

The Israeli Navy also took over the other five, smaller, ships of the flotilla. Many of the passengers were beaten up, some of them requiring hospital treatment. The commandos used tasers, plastic bullets, and stun grenades, but at least they didn’t kill anyone.

The Israelis rerouted the ships, reaching Ashdod at about 8 p.m. the next day. When the Mavi Marmara prisoners passed through the lower deck, they saw the Israelis had been busy ransacking all their belongings — “[c]lothes were everywhere, bags emptied, as if it were the aftermath of an earthquake,” recounted a British al-Jazeera journalist.

Not surprisingly, the Israelis confiscated every recording and communications device they could find, in addition to cash, credit cards, cameras and other personal belongings (soldiers were later arrested for selling laptops and using debit cards and cell phones stolen from the flotilla). But filmmaker and activist Iara Lee, one of the few Americans aboard the flotilla, managed to smuggle out a tiny camera memory card with little over 1 hour of footage. The raw 1-hour footage or a 15 min. version can be watched on Youtube. The 15 minute version is embedded below:

When they came off the ship they were searched again and then put on a bus and sent to Beer Sheva prison, where they spent the night. During their stay they were photographed, profiled, fingerprinted, DNA tested, interrogated, deprived of sleep, beaten (some several times), and made to sign off on deportation orders written in Hebrew (most of them involuntarily). For a meal they were given frozen slices of bread and potatoes. Over the next 7 days they were deported (“expelled” is another word used by some media outlets) to their respective countries. As one imprisoned American activist and co-founder of the Free Gaza Movement Dr Paul Larudee noted, “at no time did the prison authorities allow daily outdoor exercise, access to telephones, or access to a lawyer. This is illegal even under Israeli law.”

In all, 9 peace activists were murdered, and many more injured. Among those seriously injured, 54 passengers were admitted to Israeli hospitals. The patients’ families were not allowed any information about the status of their loved ones, and the hospital staff were presumably banned from talking about it to the outside world. One flotilla passenger is reportedly in a coma, and might die, bringing the total number of victims to 10.

For personal witness accounts and analyses by some of the English-speaking members on board the ship, read Midnight on the Mavi Marmara (2010), edited by Moustafa Bayoumi. Here is a description of the book:

As their testimonies indicate repeatedly, Israeli soldiers confiscated laptops, cameras, and other recording devices when they arrested and detained the activists for several days. This enabled Israeli public relations officials to fill a vacuum of information about the event and the parties involved with a media campaign described by filmmaker and flotilla activist Iara Lee as “aggressively dishonest.” Every eyewitness account in the book attests to several key facts. The activists carried no weapons. The Israeli soldiers boarded at night in international waters, which means that they were by definition aggressors who cannot claim to have acted in self-defense. They fired on the flotilla before boarding and without warning, and several of those killed were shot multiple times from close range in the back or back of the head.

Journalist Max Blumenthal and other contributors, however, illustrate how Israeli officials propagated false or misleading claims that “al-Qaeda mercenaries” were among those aboard the ships, that the passengers were carrying weapons (using photographs of kitchen knives and boating equipment as evidence), and that the activists were yelling anti-Semitic slurs (accompanying this claim with a doctored audio clip). Blumenthal describes drawing confessions from IDF officials that such claims were baseless, even while these and other reports have persisted without retraction in Israeli and Western media outlets. To this end, Midnight on the Mavi Marmara represents a critical re-litigation of the events that reclaims the activists’ humanitarian intentions.

Within hours, outrage at Israel’s action echoes around the world. Spontaneous demonstrations in Europe, the United States, Turkey, and Gaza itself denounce the attack. Turkey’s prime minister describes it as a “bloody massacre” and “state terrorism.” Lebanon’s prime minister calls it “a dangerous and crazy step that will exacerbate tensions in the region.”

In these pages, a range of activists, journalists, and analysts piece together the events that occurred that May night, unpicking their meanings for Israel’s illegal, three-year-long blockade of Gaza and the decades-long Israel/Palestine conflict more generally. Mixing together first-hand testimony, documentary record, and illustration, with hard-headed analysis and historical overview, Midnight on the Mavi Marmara reveals why the attack on Gaza Freedom Flotilla may just turn out to be Israel’s Selma, Alabama: the beginning of the end for an apartheid Palestine.

The attack was indeed condemned by all decent people in the world. But for some people, Israel can do no wrong, no matter what.


The reaction in Israel seems to have been almost unanimous. A wave of chauvinistic fervor took over before the facts of the incident could be established. Jewish journalist Max Blumenthal documented the reactions in the Israeli street:

YouTube – Israelis Celebrate IDF Flotilla Attack

Somehow videos like these didn’t make it on CNN or BBC. What would the “corporate” owners of the MSM have to lose by airing videos like these?

But let’s give credit where credit is due: some “left-wing” Israelis, reportedly up to 6,000 citizens, gathered to protest in front of the Israeli Defence Ministry in Tel Aviv. Smaller protests took place in other cities like Jerusalem, where a 21-year-old Jewish-American peace activist lost an eye when she was hit in the face by an Israeli tear gas canister. Sadly, these voices were drowned by those shown in the video above.

As for the Israeli government, IDF chief Gabi Ashkenazi defended his troops’ use of lethal fire, as did the openly racist Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman and the arch-terrorists Defense Minister Ehud Barak and the elder President Shimon Peres. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu maintained that the terrorist attack on the humanitarian activists was “a clear case of self defense”, and that it complied with international law. On 26 Oct 2010, Netanyahu visited the Shayetet 13 headquarters to personally thank and praise the terrorists. “Gaza has turned into an Iranian terror base,” Netanyahu claimed, adding that the troops had acted “courageously, morally and with restraint” and that the raid had been “crucial, essential, important and legal”.

MK Haneen Zoabi, the only female Arab member of the Knesset (Israeli parliament) was on board the Mavi Marmara. When a day or two after the massacre she tried to deliver a speech to the Knesset, she was almost eaten alive by the other MKs when trying to speak about the flotilla raid and the inhuman siege on Gaza.

YouTube – Knesset Members Attack Haneen Zoabi After Free Gaza

“The Only Democracy in the Middle East”!

At first, it looks like the chairman of the Knesset is in favor of letting her speak, by constantly calling out the many interrupting MKs who were calling her a terrorist, but it looks like he soon realizes that he is making too many enemies.

Soon after, the Knesset revoked “key priviledges” but retained her status as MK so that they can still hang on to the absurd claim that Israel is a democracy.

A Facebook group entitled “execute the MK Haneen Zoubi” appeared, and one Israeli was offering a reward of free groceries for killing Zoabi until he was arrested.

Most (all?) other Arab/Muslim MKs received an avalanche of death threats and hate mail, “extraordinary in both quantity and vitriol.”

Others wasted no time with trivial matters, thinking big. The J-Post reported on 16 June 2010 that:

A group of Israeli left-wing activists who were angry about the Turkish attacks on IDF soldiers aboard the Mavi Marmara two weeks ago decided Monday to cancel the flotilla that they were planning to Cyprus to protest the Turkish occupation of the island’s northern half.

The Jerusalem Post reported exclusively on June 5 about the planned flotilla, which was to be led by former MK Alex Goldfarb (Tzomet, Yi’ud) and Modi’in Meretz activist Pinhas Har-Zahav.

The story made headlines in Turkey, Cyprus, Greece and throughout Europe, and some 800 supporters of the flotilla joined its Facebook group.

But Israeli government officials persuaded the activists to cancel the voyage, because they were worried that the media attention would remind international media of the Gaza flotilla when most of the world’s attention had shifted to other issues like the British Petroleum spill and the World Cup.

“The publicity we already received did its part in reminding the world [that the Turks are occupiers],” one of the organizers of the flotilla said. “Personally it’s depressing for me that we didn’t get to go. But the government officials we spoke to were professionals, and they told us that doing it now was not right for the state, so we listened to them.”

So killing Turkish peace activists in international waters is OK because the Turkish military “occupies” Northern Cyprus. That Israel’s occupation of Palestine is far worse than the Turkish role in Northern Cyprus is not even considered in this propaganda stunt. Somehow, the hypocrisy escapes them.

The Turkish invasion of Cyprus in 1974 was a response to a Greek military coup planned by the brutal CIA-supported military junta that had staged a coup after Gladio false flag bombings caused chaos and increased anti-Communist sentiment in Greece. Had Turkey not intervened, Greece would probably have declared the annexation of Cyprus, and its citizens, especially the Turkish Cypriots, would have been subject to the repressive regime that had killed thousands and its infamous CIA-trained intelligence service, KYP, known for its extensive use of torture. Unfortunately, Turkey used the opportunity to further its pan-Turkish Kemalist (faux nationalist) ambitions, displacing some 150,000 Greek Cypriots, and continues to this day to be the only nation to recognize Northern Cyprus as a sovereign nation. However, the Turkish military presence in Northern Cyprus is, comparatively speaking, not very repressive in nature. The invasion and military occupation of Palestine by the Jews, in contrast, was and continues to be an absolute disaster for the Muslim and Christian people of Palestine.

Similarly, the Israeli National Student Union announced their intention to set sail toward Turkey, supposedly in an effort to bring humanitarian aid to the “oppressed people of Turkish Kurdistan” and to members of the “Turkish Armenian minority.”

Prior to the flotilla massacre, Israeli propagandists like “StandWithUs” had boats departing from the port of Ashdod to “counter” the ships of the Gaza Freedom Flotilla. Each of the boats had journalists from major international media outlets. The Zionist activists carried signs and shirts saying “Free Gaza from Hamas”, booklets with the outdated (and probably edited) Hamas charter, and other Zionist nonsense of that nature.


Protests were held in capitals and major cities around the world. Some 800 angry protesters in the UK attacked the BBC’s Manchester offices for their shameless pro-Israel reporting.

With (relatively) few exceptions like B’Tselem, Jews for Justice for Palestinians, Jewish Voices for a Just Peace (who announced they would send a boat with school supplies and humanitarian aid to Gaza), and Neturei Karta, the overwhelming majority of Jewish groups worldwide supported the Israeli position unconditionally. Would it be unfair, therefore, to say that the majority of Jews support terrorism? If it were Muslims supporting a Hamas operation, surely this question would be raised by much of the media, or at least the “right-wing” media.

In several major American cities, fanatical Zionist Jews held pro-Israel demonstrations, showing their unconditional support for a foreign country which most of them have never even visited.

In a few cities such as San Francisco, a smaller number of Jewish peace activists held protests condemning Israel, receiving death threats from the pro-Israel crowds. “We will sink the next flotilla with you on it”, rambled one of the Jewish fanatics.

Here is a photo that summarizes the typical Zionist demonstrations:

Zionist demonstrators

Let’s blow up that anti-Turkey sign:

Turkey = Murder Inc. Stop your terror armada. Admit Armenian Holocaust

“Turkey = Murder Inc. Stop your terror armada. Admit Armenian Holocaust.” And a bomb has been added to the Turkish flag for good measure.

These foolish Zionists should have done a bit of research to discover that Murder Inc. was about 0% Turkish and about 95% Jewish, and that the Armenian Holocaust, masterminded by the Young Turks and members of the Committee of Union and Progress, were as much Jewish as they were Turkish, if not moreso. Of course, pointing out these facts is anti-Semitic, but making false statements about Turks and Turkey is OK — at least if you’re Jewish.

Also notice the black woman to the left of the sign. The poor brainwashed goy does not realize that half of the people there (and that’s being generous) dislike her merely because it is visually observable that she cannot possibly be of Jewish extraction.

Aside from the Jewish Zionists, some of the American Christian Zionist leaders called for war on Turkey and the Muslims. To paraphrase John Hagee’s apocalyptic, delusory speeches: “Israel is being attacked while Iran and Hamas and now Turkey plot the destruction of the Jewish people, we must take action now!”


Within a few hours of the raid, the IDF started posting videos on Youtube, trying to portray the peace activists as “rioters” and terrorists. Some of the videos were apparently fake. The Israelis expected that no footage would make its way out of the sea, having destroyed all SD cards they could find and thrown the cameras into the sea. For example, one video that shows a stun grenade thrown into one of the speedboats looks like computer-generated graphics. Another one showing activists preparing for a confrontation appears to have been recorded not on the Mavi Marmara but during an IDF ship raid training session. The most famous of the videos, broadcast by all media outlets, which appears to show the activists beating soldiers with metal bars and other weapons, lacks the Mavi Marmara name at the top and the various flags on the side.

On June 4th, 5 days after the attack, the IDF posted on Youtube a fake audio recording which has the flotilla activists saying “go back to Auschwitz” and “don’t forget 9/11”. The IDF titled the tape Flotilla Ship to Israeli Navy: “We’re Helping Arabs Go Against the US, Don’t Forget 9/11 Guys”. The tape is so inequivocally doctored that it is probably a “deliberate mistake”, perhaps an attempt to make Israel seem incompetent at propaganda.

The doubtful video of the activists beating soldiers with metal pipes helped Israel’s image more than anything else. The next step was to claim activists had “links to terrorism.”

Israel and its many mouthpieces claimed that the IHH is connected to Hamas and is therefore a connected to a “terrorist organization”. The only source for this claim is a 2006 paper on IHH from the Danish Institute for International Studies. But that report was penned by a young, mysterious American named Evan F. Kohlman, a supposed “terrorism expert” but in fact a Zionist Jewish supremacist who hates all Arabs and Muslims the same. He cites a former French judge who also seems to find terrorists under every rock. But no matter how tenuous the claim, it was sufficient for much of the media to parrot the claim.

Not content with lying about the IHH, the IDF posted a blog on 6 June 2010 titled “Specific Flotilla Passengers Linked to Al-Qaeda, Hamas and Other Terror Organizations”. Of the 5 people they list — Fatimah Mahmadi, Ken O’Keefe, Hassan Iynasi, Hussein Urosh, and Ahmad Umimon — only 1 or 2 are from the IHH.

According to the IDF, Ken O’Keefe is “a radical anti-Israel activist and operative of the Hamas Terror organization”, despite his solid, even heroic, track record as a campaigner for peace. And Hussein Urosh of the IHH was not there to bring aid to the people of Gaza either, no, he was there to “assist in smuggling Al-Qaeda operatives via Turkey into the Strip”.

The conclusion we can draw from this is that the IDF and the Likud government no longer care about trying to make their lies credible. But why should they, when their fellow Zionist Jews have a “stranglehold” on the media, as Billy Graham put it in 1972. They can point to the aforementioned Danish intelligence report as a tangible IHH link to Hamas, but to accuse non-Muslim peace activist Ken O’Keefe of being an “operative of the Hamas Terror organization”, and claim that IHH member Hussein Urosh was involved in smuggling “Al-Qaeda” operatives into Gaza, is beyond ridiculous to anyone but the most ardent supporter of the terrorist state of Israel.


While the Turkish government rightfully called the act a brutal crime and the perpetrator a terrorist state, not so much a word of serious condemnation was uttered by the top brass of American politicians.

President Barack Obama made some vague remarks that he “deeply regrets the loss of life” (without condemning “the use of violence”, which would’ve been one step up), before reiterating “Israel’s right to defend itself.” Netanyahu told Obama to veto any UN Security Council condemnation, but he stood up to him and said no. But the US did block demands for an international inquiry. Vice President Joe Biden was even more supportive than Obama, showing an incredible level of shameless ignorance. No mention was made of the American citizen killed by the White House.

Imagine that! An American citizen, a young humanitarian activist, is assassinated by the military of a foreign state, and the American government and media do not even condemn the act! What foreign state could get away with this? Could Britain? France? Canada? Probably not.

As would be expected, US Congresscritters were quick to show their unwavering support for the terrorist act. “Israel has the right to defend itself from unprovoked attacks,” yadda yadda yadda. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell co-authored a letter signed by 85 other senators arguing for the legality of the blockade and the raid and calling on the President to support Israel. Rep. Eliot Engel (D-NY) said those on the flotilla should be banned from entering the United States.

The ADL (American Defamation League) sent a letter to Hillary Clinton pointing to both the IHH and a coalition of which it is a part, the Union of Good, as groups that should be viewed as terrorist entities alongside Hamas, Hezbollah and Al-Qaeda. Congresscritters followed the orders and tried their best to get the IHH listed as a terrorist organization, but failed because the claim is ludicrous. Only Israel added IHH to its “terror watch” list.

Needless to say, had the Mavi Marmara been an Israeli ship attacked by Hamas or Iran, the screams for blood in the US Congress would’ve been unrelenting.


The Israeli media prepared the public for the event well in advance. As peace activist Gilad Atzmon wrote as it was happening: “For days the Israeli government prepared the Israeli society for the massacre at sea. It said that the Flotilla carried weapons, it had ‘terrorists’ on board. Only yesterday evening it occurred to me that this Israeli malicious media spin was there to prepare the Israeli public for a full scale Israeli deadly military operation in international waters.”

Another indication of pre-planning was this report by Yedioth Ahronoth, the biggest newspaper in Israel:

Turkish authorities are accusing Israel of “ordering” a terror attack carried out by Kurdish rebels on the same day the Israeli Navy raided a Turkish-owned Gaza-bound ship last week in revenge for Ankara’s involvement in the incident, Turkish newspaper Zaman reported Sunday.

Seven Turkish soldiers were killed in Monday’s attack, which took place at a Turkish navy base in the southern city of Iskenderun. It occurred several hours after the Israel Defense Forces’ raid on the Marmara vessel left nine activists killed.

According to the report, published by one of Turkey’s most important newspapers, Ankara’s intelligence services are looking into the possibility that the Kurdish PKK attack was “ordered by Israel’s secret services, which sought to convey a message to the Turkish leadership.


“The same terrorists were trained by Israeli intelligence officers and trained to infiltrate the cities in the best way possible. The Israeli government is trying to present the Turkish leadership as radical and close to Hamas in order to influence the global public opinion. The Kurdish rebels are Israel’s sub-contractors.”

So in addition to 8 Turkish citizens and 1 American citizen, Israel may have had its PKK proxy kill 7 Turkish soldiers.

The early Israeli media coverage, including “left-wing self-hating” media like Haaretz, took the official IDF line as always, praising the soldiers as “noble” and “restrained” and calling the aid workers “brutal activists” or even “mercenaries” who had pre-planned a confrontation.

The narrative quickly became that the peace activists were nothing but, that they were really terrorists and terrorist sympathisers hoping for a confrontation to paint Israel in a bad light. The heroic Israeli commandos were only carrying paintball guns, and the evil militants/mercenaries pretending to be peaceful activists were armed with metal bars, bats, knives, glass bottles, and chairs — and even axes, stun grenades, and high-tech communications devices by some accounts. The highly-trained commandos stood no chance against such weapons once the terrorists realized that their opponents were armed with nothing but paintball guns.

The (“far-right”, Murdoch-owned) Jerusalem Post quoted “a top Navy commander” saying “Next time we’ll use more force”, and quoted one Shayetet 13 commando saying he singlehandedly killed six men. This highly-trained lying criminal, identified only as “S.”, the J-Post says, “is being considered for a medal of valor”. Here is his (and the IDF’s early official) version of events:

“When I hit the deck, I was immediately attacked by people with bats, metal pipes and axes,” S. told the Post. “These were without a doubt terrorists. I could see the murderous rage in their eyes and that they were coming to kill us.”

S. does not look like a hero. Well-built, like all commandos in the Shayetet, he is also soft-spoken and stingy with words, but his commander Lt.-Col. T. fills in the blanks.

“S. did a remarkable job,” T. said. “He stabilized the situation and succeeded in hitting six of the terrorists.”

Based on preliminary results of its investigation into the navy’s takeover of the Mavi Marmara, which ended with nine dead passengers and more than 30 wounded, the IDF said on Thursday that the commandos were attacked by a well-trained group of mercenaries, most of whom were found without IDs but with thousands of dollars in their pockets.

The group was well trained and was split into a number of squads of about 20 mercenaries each distributed throughout the upper deck, the IDF said. All of the mercenaries wore gas masks and ceramic bulletproof vests and were armed with either bats, slingshots, metal bars, knives or stun grenades.

The IDF’s understanding is that the mercenaries mainly chose dual-purpose items of this sort rather than guns, since opening fire would have made it blatantly clear that they were terrorists and not so-called peace activists.

Nevertheless, the IDF suspects that the group did have some guns of its own. Israeli forensic experts who examined the ship found casings belonging to a weapon that was not used by the commandos, and the Turkish captain of the ship later told the IDF that the “mercenaries” threw their weapons overboard after the commandos took control of the vessel.

T. said he realized the group they were facing was well-trained and likely ex-military after the commandos threw a number of stun grenades and fired warning shots before rappelling down onto the deck. “They didn’t even flinch,” he said. “Regular people would move.”

Each squad of the “mercenaries” was equipped with a Motorola communication device, the IDF said, so they could pass information to one another. Assessments in the defense establishment are that members of the group were affiliated with international global jihad elements and had undergone training in places like Afghanistan and Pakistan.

The “left-wing” Israeli media were 100% supportive of the IDF raid, but the “right-wing” media was just plain delusional, trying to mantain the “paintball guns” fable even after the IDF stopped promoting that lie.


The Western media was not interested in covering the Gaza Freedom Flotilla at all. They were avoiding the event entirely until the massacre occured.


While the activists were held prisoners unable to make themselves heard, Israeli spokespeople like Mark Regev were given free reign over the airwaves by the English-language Western media, but especially the US media. Not as much a peep of criticism or questioning was heard by the US media talking heads of CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, Fox News, and most of the smaller networks. They were every bit as supportive of the “raid” or “intervention” as the Israeli media.

Jewish journalist Glenn Greenwald eloquently pointed this out to Zionist Jew Eliot Spitzer in an MSNBC interview:

Glenn Greenwald Destroys MSNBC’s Eliot Spitzer

The distortions in the print media were no less astounding. Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting provides a few specific case examples from the New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, and the Associated Press.

What could possibly motivate the top American journalists and TV news anchors to avoid any criticism of Israel even after a deadly attack on courageous peace activists trying to bring food and supplies to people in need? Is it that they are all heartless monsters? Or is it that they are careerists who want to keep their million-dollar annual salary jobs? Sure that for most of the TV talking heads it may be a much of the former also, but even these heartless crooks care about their public image, which would improve if they showed some humanity when the chance presents itself.

And yet some people who voiced their outrage, mainly liberal types but also some conservative types of good conscience, still insist that the media problem is best defined as “corporate”, and that the Jewish domination of the US media (and to a lesser extent the British media) has nothing to do with it. No, that would be anti-Semitic to even point out!

An American citizen is executed by soldiers under the orders of the Israeli government, and the American government doesn’t say a peep. But worse yet, the “American” media doesn’t even report the UN findings (that the American citizen and 5 others were “summarily executed”). Are we supposed to believe that “corporate interests”, and not Zionist Jewish interests, are behind this censorship?

And the fact that they were able to do the same in 1967, when they tried to sink the USS Liberty to get a war started, doesn’t seem to concern the “left independent media” either, spineless cowards that they are.

The result of the US media’s unapologetic support for Israel was 49% of Americans believing the peace activists were entirely to blame, and only 19% blamed Israel, according to a Rasmussen poll.

The BBC — which along with CNN is broadcast all around the world — was no less criminally complicit, with its appalling Panorama programme (broadcast 16 Aug 2010) showcasing the extent of its Zionist deception:

BBC Bias: The Gaza Freedom Flotilla

This BBC Panorama programme was such an outrageous case of Zionist propaganda that some people gathered outside the BBC HQ to protest, but turnout was low as it was months after the massacre. The BBC had previously refused to run a humanitarian commercial for helping the people of Gaza after Israel’s Operation Cast Lead bloodbath.


The single most influential source on the Internet on most subjects, particularly in the long term, is Wikipedia. The Wikipedia talk page on the flotilla raid is/was full of editors complaining that they found themselves powerless when trying to make the article more neutral (to comply with Wikipedia’s NPOV policy). An anonymous Wikipedia editor wrote:

“There is a reason why many of these articles are pro-Israel. Zionist movements are learning their people how to play the system that is wikipedia: [1] They are getting courses about how to fight their ‘zionist war’ on wikipedia, what the rules are and how to find the loopgholes. There is no solution to this until their force is neutralized by people in Gaza doing the same thing. But of course those people have nothing, let alone a computer.”

Indeed, large numbers of Israeli settlers and other Jewish extremists have been taking part in Wikipedia “Zionist editing” courses. This barely made the news, whereas a “Jihadist editing course” would be 24/7 news for a week. One of the organizers, Naftali Bennett, who represents Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank, said: “if someone searches [for] ‘the Gaza flotilla,’ we want to be there; to influence what is written there, how it’s written and to ensure that it is balanced and Zionist in nature.” To motivate the volunteers, the organizers are offering a prize for the “Best Zionist Editor” — “the person who over the next four years incorporates the most “Zionist” changes in the encyclopedia,” Haaretz wrote. A participant is quoted as saying that the first subjects she will edit are the Turkish flotilla, MK Haneen Zoabi, and the settlements.

Worse yet, some of the most active Wikipedia administrators, such as “Jayjg”, spend inordinate amounts of time policing the Israel-related articles to make sure they reflect the Zionist view. “Jayjg” is known for always having his way, and banning persistent editors who try to revert his edits. You can find his name on almost every talk page for articles related to Israeli and “anti-Semitic” topics.

Hasbara groups also got busy telling their volunteers to post pro-Israel messages on news sites, blogs and forums, and to flag Youtube videos complaining that they are — you guessed it — “anti-Semitic” and “hateful”.

The Palestinians have no such representatives. Most don’t even have reliable electricity, let alone a computer with an Internet connection.

Other influential sources in the early days after an event are news wires of commonly used services, such as Google and Yahoo. Documenting censorship in these areas is difficult, but Google News was reported to have ignored coverage of the flotilla raid. The AFP and AP news wire services are sympathetic to Israel and their short headlines reflected that.


Aside from being an act of terrorism in international waters, it was a crime against Turkish and American citizens. Most of the victims were Turkish, but one victim, 19-year-old activist Furkan Dogan (whose murder was apparently caught on tape), was an American-born US citizen of Turkish descent and not a member of the IHH.

After asking the US to open an investigation to no avail, the father of Furkan Dogan is suing the Israeli government. Imagine the press coverage this would get if the plaintiff was an Israeli-American rather than a Turkish-American and the defendants were Hamas or Iran rather than Israel.

Turkish-Israeli relations soured very quickly. President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey has been uncomfortably close to Israel in the view of most Turks, but he was quick to demonstrate that he is not a total puppet like Obama and Bush.

“Nine Turkish martyrs on the ship received 21 bullets from Israeli soldiers in their bodies, we provided post mortem reports and even the pictures to the EU and U.S. but Washington is not ready to condemn the state terrorism of Israel against Turkey which means that the U.S. is supporting an international terrorist who killed our citizens in international waters,” Erdogan said.

Reportedly, the intelligence agency of Turkey (National Intelligence Organization) and Israel’s Mossad, which once enjoyed close cooperation, stopped exchanging intelligence and conducting joint operations.

Feeling the pressure from angry Egyptians, Zionist puppet dictator Mubarak ordered the Rafah Border Crossing with the Gaza Strip opened for a while. Humanitarian and medical aid was allowed through, but no construction materials.

As mentioned, the US didn’t even condemn Israel, much less consider any punishment. But not only did the US take absolutely no action against Israel — neither did NATO. Turkey, a member of NATO, is attacked by a non-member, and NATO does nothing, demonstrating once again that NATO is controlled by Israel’s obedient puppet, the USA. Former British ambassador to Uzbekistan Craig Murray explained:

What I was being told last night was very interesting indeed. NATO HQ in Brussels is today a very unhappy place. There is a strong understanding among the various national militaries that an attack by Israel on a NATO member flagged ship in international waters is an event to which NATO is obliged – legally obliged, as a matter of treaty – to react.

I must be plain – nobody wants or expects military action against Israel. But there is an uneasy recognition that in theory that ought to be on the table, and that NATO is obliged to do something robust to defend Turkey.

Mutual military support of each other is the entire raison d’etre of NATO. You must also remember that to the NATO military the freedom of the high seas guaranteed by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea is a vital alliance interest which officers have been conditioned to uphold their whole career.

The flotilla massacre serves as undeniable proof that NATO is an obsolete institution utilized to drag smaller member nations into wars started by the Zionist warmongers.


The International Fact-Finding Mission to Investigate the Israeli attacks on the Flotilla, established by the UN Human Rights Council and chaired by Karl Hudson-Phillips, concluded in September 2010 that “six of the deceased were victims of summary executions”, that “the Israeli security forces demonstrated levels of totally unnecessary violence”, and, not surprisingly, that “two requests for cooperation information from the Israeli government proved fruitless.”

Rejecting calls from the United Nations and governments all around the world for an independent investigation of the events, the Israeli leaders opted instead to investigate themselves. Around January 2011, its Turkel Committee released its 245-page report whitewashing the crime. The conclusions reached by the Turkel Committee completely contradict international law and the findings of the UN Human Rights Council mission.

The Turkel investigation, as expected, was a complete sham that “cleared the government and military of wrongdoing” and claimed that the “passengers were to blame for the violence.” Judge Jacob Turkel himself said during proceedings that “the people of Gaza have brought this hardship on themselves”. Another panelist repeated the ludicrous lie that “there is no humanitarian crisis in Gaza”. They had 2 non-Jewish but “Israel friendly” military law experts who acted as “international observers” to give the whole charade a semblance of legitimacy.

The only place where the Turkel report was taken seriously, aside from Israel, were the Zionist occupied territories known as the US Congress, the White House, and the US media studios.


Just 6 days after the Mavi Marmara massacre, Israel boarded yet another aid ship, the MV Rachel Corrie, which was part of the Gaza Freedom Flotilla but was unable to join the other six ships in the flotilla because of mechanical problems (probably due to Israeli sabotage) that forced it to undergo repairs. Named after the young American activist who was crushed to death by an American-made bulldozer when trying to prevent it from demolishing a Palestinian home, the Rachel Corrie set sail from Ireland, flew a Cambodian flag, and was sponsored by money raised by the great Mahathir Mohammed of Malaysia. Among the passengers were two well known Irish citizens, Nobel Peace Laureate Mairead Maguire and Denis Halliday, a former UN assistant Secretary-General.

Israeli commandos boarded the ship from speedboats at around noon on 5 June 2010, again in international waters. The Israeli commandos seized control, and the ship and its passengers were again diverted towards the Israeli port of Ashdod. After an inspection, Israel reportedly delivered the entire cargo to Gaza, but there is no way to know if they really did.

On 14 July, a Libyan charity organization headed by Saif al-Islam, the son of Muammar Gaddafi, chartered the MV Amalthea to deliver humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip through Egypt’s Rafah crossing. The ship carried food, medical supplies and pre-fabricated houses.

On 16 May 2011, Israel prevented another humanitarian ship from reaching Gaza. The MV Finch, nicknamed the Spirit of Rachel Corrie, left Greece on May 11th, carrying plastic sewage pipes (unsuitable for weapons, so Israel has no excuse) to help restore the devastated sewerage system in Gaza (which is increasingly causing diseases such as typhoid and hepatitis A). The mission was sponsored by the Perdana Global Peace Foundation (PGPF), chaired by the former Prime Minister of Malaysia, Mahathir Mohamad.

Once Spirit of Rachel Corrie entered Gaza territorial waters, an Israeli Navy ship circled the humanitarian ship twice while firing warning shots. One of the 12 crew members was almost hit by a bullet, causing a panic and heightened fear. In addition, the vessel developed engine trouble and lost its steering capability. This was apparently due to a fishing net and not due to Israeli sabotage.

After calling the Egyptian army for help, an Egyptian naval vessel came to the scene, causing the Israeli boats to leave, but not before warning that “next time, we will land on your ship.” The ship was then escorted to Egyptian waters and anchored off the Egyptian port of Al Arish. Matthias Chang, spokesman for the mission, said that “the Egyptian foreign minister has given his assurance that we will be allowed to unload our humanitarian cargo and that it will be taken by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency into Gaza.” This was the original intention, but Egypt didn’t answer the original request, so the humanitarian activists decided to try to enter Gaza by sea, even knowing the savagery the Israelis are capable of.

In 2011, 25 vessels are set to sail to Gaza carrying 1,500 activists, up from 6 vessels and 700 activists last year. The IHH will be represented by only 100 activists.

The latest aid flotillas are scheduled for the third week of June 2011. The AP reports that “Israeli military officials have confirmed that preparations are under way to stop any new flotilla while avoiding casualties, and that they would use different tactics this time around.”

How nice of them to try to avoid casualties. The only decent thing to do, of course, is to let them through, and lift the blockade completely. Now that Egypt is opening the Rafah crossing, it’s the only logical thing for Israel to do.

Will Israel do the logical (and moral) thing? Don’t count on it.